DesktopLinux
Home  |  News  |  Articles  |  Forum  |  Polls  |  Blogs  |  Videos  |  ITLink

Keywords: Match:
Results from the OSDL's 2006 Desktop Linux Survey
a guest column by the OSDL (Jan. 25, 2007)

Foreword: The OSDL's Desktop Linux Working Group has released a report summarizing the results of its 2006 Desktop Linux Client Survey. The report appears below; be sure to click each question in the list at the bottom of the page, to view a graph of each question's responses.

The group's concurrently-published 2006 "state of the Linux desktop" report can be found in a companion DesktopLinux.com article, here:


Desktop Linux 2006: The Year in Review




2006 Desktop Linux Client Survey: Analysis

Prepared by the OSDL Desktop Linux (DTL) Working Group




Introduction: 2006 Desktop Linux Client Survey

Spread the word:
digg this story
The OSDL Desktop Linux Working Group (DTL) is focused on accelerating the use of Linux on the enterprise desktop and identifying technical and social barriers to adoption. In October 2005, the DTL launched the first OSDL Desktop Linux Client survey. This year, the 2006 OSDL Linux Client Survey was launched during the month of November and received over 2500 responses. The goals of the survey were to determine the key factors driving Linux on the desktop, to identify major barriers to Linux desktop adoption, and to identify any trends that may surface since the last survey last year.

Discussion points
  • The application environment for Linux desktops
  • Peripheral support that is critical to Linux deployments
  • Factors which are driving decisions to deploy Linux on the desktop
  • Areas of focus for the Linux desktop community in 2007
  • The application environment for Linux desktops
  • The following barriers for deploying Linux desktops are (listed in order):
  • Application availability
  • Quality of peripheral support
  • End user training
  • Desktop management issues
We found that the top barrier (application availability) was by far the most critical to Linux desktop adoption. An analysis of the free form responses to factors that were putting the deployment of Linux on hold also showed the lack of applications for the Linux desktop leading the way. It is not that applications don't exist for the Linux desktop, but users grow accustomed to certain applications that they just can't live without. The application list is pretty similar to the list that was compiled from the survey in 2005. Leading the way were:
  • Microsoft Office
  • Adobe photoshop
  • AutoCAD and other Windowsbased
  • CAD/CAM applications
  • MS Project
  • Visio
  • Quickbooks
Other applications or capabilities that surfaced this time around were MS exchange compatibility, VPN (i.e. Activcard support), online meeting client software, smartphone synchronization of calendar and address book, Dreamweaver, and of course, games. Custom applications which are industry specific are almost always written for Windows without Linux ports or equivalent applications.

Applications that appeared on the critical list in 2005, but not in 2006 were email and messaging applications as well as browser and database applications.

Peripheral support that is critical to Linux deployments

The quality of peripheral support was listed right behind application availability in the list of barriers to Linux desktop deployments. The following peripheral device support was required to meet business needs (listed in order):
  • Printers
  • Personal storage devices (i.e. USB memory)
  • Scanners
  • Digital cameras
  • Mail and messaging devices
  • Web cam / video
  • Smartphones
It is interesting to note that if we combined the devices that are considered to be mobile communication devices (PDA devices, smart phones, tablets, and GPS), then mobile communication devices would have easily topped the list of business devices.

Survey responders indicated that printing has gotten significantly better in 2006. However, it is still difficult to buy a printer at your local electronics store and expect it to work out of the box on a Linux machine. While most printers are supported on Linux, there is still a lag from the time when a printer hits the market to when the driver driver is available and automatically installed on your computer by a commercial distro update.

Factors that are driving decisions to deploy Linux on the desktop

Applications, applications, applications.

Areas of focus for the Linux desktop community in 2007

Survey respondents were asked to send a message to the Linux desktop community. The focus areas that they requested were (in order of priority):
  • Open source drivers
  • Wireless
  • Linux desktop standards
  • Printing
  • Audio/multimedia
Open source drivers have been an issue for Linux desktops for a long time. The hard technical problems have been solved. The main factors holding back open source drivers are related to the size of the Linux market and protection of intellectual property. The wireless community has made huge strides in 2006 in supporting more wireless chip sets and more capabilities in the wireless software stack. Wireless support will always be in demand and will enable portable desktops (laptops) and mobile devices (smart phones).

When respondents say that Linux desktop standards are important, they are really saying that applications must be able to run across distributions and must be compatible with older releases of these distributions. Application vendors cannot afford to develop, distribute, and support applications across a fragmented Linux market.

Printing on a Linux desktop has made significant advancements in the number and types of printers that are supported. The desktop printing summits organized by the OSDL drew 40 people representing everybody from major hardware vendors and Linux distributors to consultants and standards organizations. This printing community is continuing to develop support for more printers and in standardizing methods for installing printers.

Desktop architects at the third Desktop Architects Meeting (DAM) in December identified audio on Linux to be a critical focus area and the community is organizing to help application vendors understand which audio interfaces to use. While audio can be made to work on a Linux desktop, problems with proprietary CODECs, audio configuration, and problems with multiple applications accessing a single audio device are being addressed by the desktop community. Look for some significant announcements early in 2007 which will address the use of proprietary CODECs.

Conclusion

Linux on the desktop grew and matured in 2006. While some analysts reported a stall in Linux penetration on the desktop in 2006, a number of significant milestones were reached that promise to continue to move the Linux desktop ahead in 2007. The most important changes to desktop Linux were all of the "under the hood" incremental improvements that took place around printing, plug-and-play support, laptop enablement and the arrival of the compositing manager that allows for modern graphics.


Graphs of 2006 Survey Responses


Please click on each survey question to view a chart of the responses:

Copyright (c) 2007 by the OSDL. All rights reserved. Reproduced by DesktopLinux.com with permission.


Related Stories


(Click here for further information)


7 Advantages of D2D Backup
For decades, tape has been the backup medium of choice. But, now, disk-to-disk (D2D) backup is gaining in favor. Learn why you should make the move in this whitepaper.

4 Legal Reasons to Control Internet Access
The Internet is obviously a valuable resource for many organizations. However, many are exposed to legal liability concerns because they fail to control Internet access. Learn if you're safe in this white paper.

Rapidly Resolve J2EE Application Problems
Whether you are in the process of building J2EE applications or have J2EE applications already running in production, you must ensure that they deliver the expected ROI. Learn how in this white paper.

Load Testing 2.0 for Web 2.0
There are many unknowns in stress testing Web 2.0 applications. Find out how to test the performance of Web 2.0 in this white paper.

Build Better Games Online
For the game infrastructure providers, life is complex. Making money from games has become more complicated. Why? Find out in this white paper.

Building a Virtual Infrastructure from Servers to Storage
This white paper discusses the virtual storage solutions that reduce cost, increase storage utilization, and address the challenges of backing up and restoring Server environments.

Gaining Faster Wireless Connections with WiMAX
Welcome to what is quickly becoming the hyperconnected world where anything that would benefit from being connected to the network will be connected. Learn more in this white paper.

Is Your Desktop a Security Threat?
The new wave of sophisticated crimeware not only targets specific companies, but also targets desktops and laptops as backdoor entryways into those business’ operations and resources. Learn how to stay safe in this white paper.

Increasing SAN Reliability by 100 Percent
Storage area networks (SAN) are a strong part of storage plans. Learn how to increase your reliability and uptime by 100 percent in this case study.

 



Got a HOT tip?   please tell us!

ADVERTISEMENT
(Advertise here)


Desktop Linux books

Join our Desktop Linux discussion forums:
•  Moving to Linux
•  Linux/Windows debate!
•  Linux Q&A
. . . and more

Linux vs. Windows
•  in the enterprise
•  in gadgets & devices

Most popular recent stories:
• A Vista vs. Linux matchup
• Choosing a desktop Linux distro
• Linus versus GNOME
• Why Windows wins and Linux loses
• The best free desktop Linux
• Why Windows Vista will suck
• 2006 Desktop Linux year in review
• The well-tempered Debian desktop
• Here come the Dell Linux desktops, laptops
• Seven Linux distros fight over one old ThinkPad
• Putting openSUSE 10.2 through its paces
• Results from the 2006 Desktop Linux Survey


BREAKING NEWS

• Graphics board vendor touts faster Linux drivers
• Private St. Louis school goes Linux
• Xandros quietly acquires Linspire
• Microsoft pushes India toward Linux
• "Intrepid Ibex" plucks up courage for alpha release
• Military-grade USB key supports Linux desktops
• CentOS 5.2 ships with enhanced virtualization
• Ubuntu "MID Edition" ships
• Gutsy Geeks take Linux to the airwaves
• OpenSUSE 11.0 arrives
• Opera 9.5 gets mad at malware
• Sample chapter available for revised Ubuntu book
• Linux jukebox app achieves first stable release
• OpenSUSE forums merge
• Desktop Linux platforms debut at Computex



Linux-Watch headlines:
• Microsoft tactics push India toward Linux
• Bell, SuperMicro sued over GPL
• "Business intelligence" software goes GPL
• Will Atom bomb?
• LF Summit videos posted
• Linux gains "embedded" maintainers
• Virtualization on tap in SLES and RHEL upgrades
• Linux gets security black eye
• Verizon chooses Linux "platform of choice"
• Hats off to Fedora 9


Visit the...


news feed

Home  |  News  |  Articles  |  Forum  |  Polls  |  About  |  Contact
 

Ziff Davis Enterprise Home | Contact Us | Advertise | Link to Us | Reprints | Magazine Subscriptions | Newsletters
Tech RSS Feeds | White Papers | ROI Calculators | Tech Podcasts | Tech Video | VARs | Channel News

Baseline | Careers | Channel Insider | CIO Insight | DesktopLinux | DeviceForge | DevSource | eSeminars |
eWEEK | Enterprise Network Security | LinuxDevices | Linux Watch | Microsoft Watch | Mid-market | Networking | PDF Zone |
Publish | Security IT Hub | Strategic Partner | Web Buyer's Guide | Windows for Devices

Developer Shed | Dev Shed | ASP Free | Dev Articles | Dev Hardware | SEO Chat | Tutorialized | Scripts |
Code Walkers | Web Hosters | Dev Mechanic | Dev Archives | igrep

Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Except where otherwise specified, the contents of this site are copyright © 1999-2008 Ziff Davis Enterprise Holdings Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Ziff Davis Enterprise is prohibited. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.