| OpenOffice is ten years behind MS Office? That's just fine! |
by Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols (Mar. 6, 2006)
In an interview with Australian online technology newspaper IT Wire, Alan Yates, general manager of business strategy for Microsoft's information worker group, said that OpenOffice.org is about where MS-Office was 10 years ago. That is to say, Microsoft seems to think OpenOffice.org is only good for single-desktop users.
And, that's a problem because...?
I don't get it.
I use OO.o (OpenOffice.org) 2 every day. It works. It has all the features I need. It's fast. It's reliable. I can send files from it via email directly from my application. It's also secure, unlike Office. And, its file format can also be read now and forever-after by any program that uses the ODF (Open Document Format).
Oh, and did I mention that OO.o doesn't cost a penny, while Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003 lists for $499?
OK, I give up, what's the problem with OO.o again?
Let's get real for a minute. There has not been a significant upgrade in Office suite functionality, from anyone, since, oh, Office 97.
In fact, I still have a copy of 97 running on a Windows 98SE system on a wheezy Compaq Presario 4665 with a 300 MHz Intel Pentium MMX processor and 64 MB of RAM. To refresh my memory, I booted it up in my back room.
I played with it for a few minutes, and, you know what? Yates is right. OO.o 2.0 works and looks a lot like Office 97. In other words, it works better than Office 2003.
There's been no real progress in Office suites for years. That's for a very good reason. By 1997, they already did what 99 percent of all users want them to do.
As for the "improvements," you can keep most of them. Menus that won't show you all your choices until you've wasted a few seconds? Obscure features buried in menu systems so deep that you need a pick-axe to find them? You can keep them.
What I think Yates really wants to do, though, isn't to compare OO.o to Office 2003, which is just the latest Microsoft standalone office suite. No, what I think he really wants to do is to get people thinking in terms of office suites as networked applications.
In short, he wants to start making people believe that they need Microsoft's upcoming Office Live, which is a suite of Web-based small business applications, and its new Office server offerings such as Microsoft Office Forms Server 2007 and SharePoint Server 2007.
What Microsoft is trying to do with all of these is to get businesses to put all their business applications eggs, including the basic office suite functionality, into one Microsoft network basket.
Of course, once a business takes that step, it's all over with. They're going to be stuck with paying Microsoft subscription fees until the end of time.
Microsoft has always been about lock-in. If they can get a company to seal its fate by using interlocking Microsoft applications on both the front- and back-end, it will be almost impossible for them to go to another company's programs.
No thank you.
I'll stick with my standalone office suites. So should you.
Even if you're using Microsoft Office, at least so long as you don't invest in the backend services or Office 2007, you'll keep your software freedom. Even if you don't give a hoot about open-source software, your checkbook will thank you.
-- Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
 About the author: Ziff Davis Internet editor Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols has been using and writing about technology and business since the late '80s and thinks he may just have learned something about them along the
way.
Do you have comments on this story?
Talkback here
Related stories:
(Click here for further information)
|
|
|
Approaching the Linux Desktop
The purpose of this paper is to help organizations evaluate the Linux desktop against their own enterprise needs and discover what benefits the Linux desktop might bring to their organizations.
Migrating To Linux: Application Challenges and Solutions
Several solutions exist to help organizations migrate in an orderly fashion from Windows to Linux desktops. This paper establishes the characteristics of an ideal cross-platform solution and reviews these alternatives in light of this ideal standard. The paper takes a closer look at the pros and cons of various solutions and outlines the business benefits that can be achieved.
Linux Advantages: Publicly Available Information on Linux Software
This paper offers a brief summary of readily-available Linux information to help businesses sort out this widely misunderstood operating system.
Top 5 Strategies for Managing Linux
Despite continuous evolution in the manageability of Linux, a 2006 survey cited manageability concerns as a top reason why organizations are hesitating to adopt Linux. Levanta believes Linux can be as manageable, if not more so, than other operating systems by following key strategies. These strategic recommendations were developed from experiences in numerous customer environments, both large and small.
Why Choose Novell for Linux?
This paper outlines the benefits of switching to the Linux platform and choosing Novell as a high-performance, enterprise solution.
Enterprise Linux Selection Guide
Considering moving your enterprise to the Linux operating system? Since there are so many similar versions, choosing the right one can be tough. This paper offers a clear process to help you make an informed decision and get the features, support, and cost that are right for your business and technical needs.
Overcoming Challenges in Managing Linux
Levanta has created a new administration model with innovative technology that breaks down the barriers to making the most of Linux systems. This paper will provide an in-depth look at the workings of Levanta’s product, the first Linux appliance of its kind.
SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 for Retail Businesses
Discover why major retailers have switched to SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop in the back office. SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 is a low-cost desktop that offers a complete set of productivity applications and interoperates seamlessly with the other Windows, Macintosh and UNIX desktops in your store.
Moving to a Linux Desktop
Migrating from Windows to Linux on the desktop can be a substantial undertaking because it has the potential for touching -- and perhaps disrupting -- every user in your organization. Unlike a data center (server and infrastructure) migration that is largely transparent to users, the cultural and administrative transitions and environment readiness required to support a Linux desktop migration are extensive.
Seven Good Reasons to Exchange Exchange
This paper describes seven compelling reasons why you should switch from Exchange to Scalix.
|
|
|
|
|
news feed
