| Mozilla goes commercial |
Aug. 03, 2005
 The nonprofit Mozilla Foundation has set up a commercial subsidiary to cash in on the popularity of its flagship Firefox browser. With its flagship Firefox emerging as a legitimate alternative to Microsoft Corp.'s dominant Internet Explorer Web browser, the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation wants to cash in on the revenue-generation possibilities.
The open-source group on Wednesday announced a major reorganization that includes the creation of the Mozilla Corporation, a for-profit subsidiary to ride the Firefox gravy train.
Mozilla Corp., which will operate out of the Foundation's Mountain View, Calif., headquarters, has been set up as a wholly owned commercial subsidiary to generate revenues to support development, testing, and productization of the various Mozilla open-source technologies.
"The broad adoption of Mozilla Firefox has created significant economic value both in Firefox itself and in a commercial ecosystem that is developing around Firefox," Mozilla said in a statement.
Mozilla described the economic value as "an unintended but real by-product" of its goal to provide a browser with enough market share to drive open standards on the Web. "Carefully managed, this value and the resulting ability to generate revenue can be used to make the Mozilla project self-sustaining and help keep the Internet open and diverse," the group added.
Mitchell Baker, who has served for the past two years as "chief lizard wrangler" at the Mozilla Foundation, will assume the title of president of Mozilla Corp. All 36 employees at the Foundation will immediately move over to the Corporation.
Brendan Eich, a co-founder and longtime technical leader of the Mozilla project, is now the chief technical officer of the new corporation, while the board of directors will remain the same except for the addition of Reid Hoffman, chief executive of social networking service LinkedIn Corp.
While making no bones about its intention to make money from Firefox and other high-profile projects, Mozilla officials are wary of possible backlash from hard-core volunteers who helped push Firefox's market share with the aggressive Spread Firefox grassroots campaign.
"[The] purpose is not to generate a return on investment in the financial sense. It is not an investment vehicle or an IPO candidate. It is completely owned by the Mozilla Foundation," Baker said in a blog entry detailing the reasons for the reorganization.
Frank Hecker, director of policy for the Mozilla Foundation, said the decision to create a subsidiary had been in the works for several months and is unrelated to Microsoft's decision to push out an IE refresh.
Hecker, who chaired the advisory committee that led to the creation of Mozilla Corp., said it was a no-brainer to create the separation to pursue business relationships within a for-profit taxation framework.
"There are existing relationships with search engine providers that will be transferred to the new Corporation. These relationships will continue in the context of the new organization that's better positioned to generate revenues to continue the Foundation's work," Hecker said in an interview with Ziff Davis Internet News.
"In my mind, commercial activities around open source and free software are not antithetically opposed. People have had businesses and commercial entities built on open source and free software. This is no different," he said.
Once the code remains free and open and the licensing terms remain unchanged, Hecker thinks the volunteer community will continue to provide support.
"The Mozilla Foundation is just as free and open source as it was yesterday," he said, noting that the Foundation's project has always had commercial involvement. Mozilla has in the past received financial and staffing contributions from such companies as America Online Inc., Google Inc., IBM and Novell Inc.
"The people involved from the very beginning knew that there were commercial interests involved. I don't think it will be an issue where people will be concerned about contributing code," Hecker said.
Contrary to published reports, Hecker insisted there are no plans for the new unit to start charging for product support for the various Mozilla projects. "There is no plan to offer support services and we won't be charging for Firefox either. Those products will remain free," he said.
"As a personal opinion, I think the goal of the Foundation and the Corporation should be to encourage commercial companies to get involved and build value on top of these products. It doesn't make sense for Mozilla to attempt to be all things to all people," he added.
The Mozilla Foundation, which is working on Firefox 1.5, does not plan to distribute its own versions of Firefox and Thunderbird and it will continue to allow others to distribute versions of Firefox and Thunderbird in accordance with the Mozilla trademark policy.
The Foundation has published a list of frequently asked questions to explain the division of responsibilities between the two organizations.
Additional perspective...
For added perspective on this topic, we recommend reading the following two recent articles:
If you found this eWEEK.com article by Ryan Naraine informative, be sure to check out eWEEK.com's Linux & Open Source Center for the latest open-source news, reviews, and analysis.
Related Stories:
(Click here for further information)
|
|
|
Approaching the Linux Desktop
The purpose of this paper is to help organizations evaluate the Linux desktop against their own enterprise needs and discover what benefits the Linux desktop might bring to their organizations.
Migrating To Linux: Application Challenges and Solutions
Several solutions exist to help organizations migrate in an orderly fashion from Windows to Linux desktops. This paper establishes the characteristics of an ideal cross-platform solution and reviews these alternatives in light of this ideal standard. The paper takes a closer look at the pros and cons of various solutions and outlines the business benefits that can be achieved.
Linux Advantages: Publicly Available Information on Linux Software
This paper offers a brief summary of readily-available Linux information to help businesses sort out this widely misunderstood operating system.
Top 5 Strategies for Managing Linux
Despite continuous evolution in the manageability of Linux, a 2006 survey cited manageability concerns as a top reason why organizations are hesitating to adopt Linux. Levanta believes Linux can be as manageable, if not more so, than other operating systems by following key strategies. These strategic recommendations were developed from experiences in numerous customer environments, both large and small.
Why Choose Novell for Linux?
This paper outlines the benefits of switching to the Linux platform and choosing Novell as a high-performance, enterprise solution.
Enterprise Linux Selection Guide
Considering moving your enterprise to the Linux operating system? Since there are so many similar versions, choosing the right one can be tough. This paper offers a clear process to help you make an informed decision and get the features, support, and cost that are right for your business and technical needs.
Overcoming Challenges in Managing Linux
Levanta has created a new administration model with innovative technology that breaks down the barriers to making the most of Linux systems. This paper will provide an in-depth look at the workings of Levanta’s product, the first Linux appliance of its kind.
SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 for Retail Businesses
Discover why major retailers have switched to SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop in the back office. SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 is a low-cost desktop that offers a complete set of productivity applications and interoperates seamlessly with the other Windows, Macintosh and UNIX desktops in your store.
Moving to a Linux Desktop
Migrating from Windows to Linux on the desktop can be a substantial undertaking because it has the potential for touching -- and perhaps disrupting -- every user in your organization. Unlike a data center (server and infrastructure) migration that is largely transparent to users, the cultural and administrative transitions and environment readiness required to support a Linux desktop migration are extensive.
Seven Good Reasons to Exchange Exchange
This paper describes seven compelling reasons why you should switch from Exchange to Scalix.
|
|
|
|
|
news feed
