| SCO goes belly-up |
Sep. 14, 2007
 Years after it was first predicted, The SCO Group, a Unix and mobile software distributor better known for its Linux litigation, has filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.
SCO's Board of Directors unanimously decided that Chapter 11 reorganization is in the best long-term interest of SCO and its subsidiaries, as well as its customers, shareholders and employees. At the same time, SCO's subsidiary, SCO Operations, has also filed a petition for reorganization.
In the U.S. court system, a case filed under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code is often called a "reorganization" bankruptcy. In the case of a corporation going Chapter 11, its funds exist separately and apart from its owners, the stockholders. Therefore, a Chapter 11 doesn't put the personal assets of the stockholders at risk aside from the value of their investment in the company's stock.
When SCO filed for Chapter 11 it was also given an automatic stay of time during which all judgments, collection activities, foreclosures and repossessions of property are suspended and may not be pursued by the creditors on any debt or claim that arose before the bankruptcy petition filing.
During this period, a business may file a plan of reorganization during the first 120-day period after the petition is filed. The court can also give SCO an extension of up to 18 months after the petition date to come up with an acceptable reorganization plan that will enable it to meet its debts. On top of that, SCO has 180 days to obtain acceptances of its plan.
Like most Chapter 11 companies, SCO intends to maintain all normal business operations throughout the bankruptcy proceedings. Subject to court approval, SCO and its subsidiaries will use the cash flow from their consolidated operations to meet their capital needs during the reorganization process.
"We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations," Darl McBride, president and CEO of SCO, based in Lindon, Utah, said in a statement. "Chapter 11 reorganization provides the company with an opportunity to protect its assets during this time while focusing on building our future plans."
SCO gave no reason for this decision. However, in recent months, the company had been slammed in the courts. First, the U.S. District Court ruled that Novell, not SCO, owned Unix's intellectual property. This knocked out the key props to many of SCO's other lawsuits.
This decision also makes it likely that SCO owes at least some of the 26.5 million dollars it received from Sun and Microsoft in 2003. These funds had been used, in turn, to fuel SCO's anti-Linux litigation.
On Sept. 17, the remaining issues in SCO vs. Novell were to be heard by the judge. All these issues touched upon how much money SCO would owe Novell from its Microsoft, Sun and any additional SCO-source license deals.
Now, however, as Bruce Lowry, director of global public relations for Novell, based in Waltham, Mass., noted, "Under U.S. bankruptcy law, any pending litigation against a company that files bankruptcy is stayed. So the trial that was to start on Monday is on hold. We'll be assessing our options for pursuing our interests relative to SCO. That's all we can say at this stage."
Since Judge Dale Kimball has already shown himself to be persuaded by Novell's arguments, it seems likely SCO decided to protect its remaining assets before he could render a decision on just how much money SCO owed Novell. In its most recent public quarterly filing, April 30, SCO only had total assets of $19.8 million.
Last, but not least, SCO's earnings have continued their decline. In addition, the company's stock sank below a dollar per share after the first Novell decision. After today's bankruptcy filing, SCO's shares sank still further -- by 28 cents or 43 percent per share -- to fall to 37 cents per share at the end of the market day.
SCO also filed a series of first-day motions in the Bankruptcy Court to ensure that it will be able to keep maintaining and honoring all of its commitments to its customers. These motions are designed to keep SCO in business until a decision is rendered on its bankruptcy.
—Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Do you have comments on this story?
Talkback here
NOTE: Please post your comments regarding our articles using the above link. Be sure to use this article's title as the "Subject" in your posts. Before you create a new thread, please check to see if a discussion thread is already running on the article you plan to comment on. Thanks!
Related stories:
(Click here for further information)
|
|
|
Approaching the Linux Desktop
The purpose of this paper is to help organizations evaluate the Linux desktop against their own enterprise needs and discover what benefits the Linux desktop might bring to their organizations.
Migrating To Linux: Application Challenges and Solutions
Several solutions exist to help organizations migrate in an orderly fashion from Windows to Linux desktops. This paper establishes the characteristics of an ideal cross-platform solution and reviews these alternatives in light of this ideal standard. The paper takes a closer look at the pros and cons of various solutions and outlines the business benefits that can be achieved.
Linux Advantages: Publicly Available Information on Linux Software
This paper offers a brief summary of readily-available Linux information to help businesses sort out this widely misunderstood operating system.
Top 5 Strategies for Managing Linux
Despite continuous evolution in the manageability of Linux, a 2006 survey cited manageability concerns as a top reason why organizations are hesitating to adopt Linux. Levanta believes Linux can be as manageable, if not more so, than other operating systems by following key strategies. These strategic recommendations were developed from experiences in numerous customer environments, both large and small.
Why Choose Novell for Linux?
This paper outlines the benefits of switching to the Linux platform and choosing Novell as a high-performance, enterprise solution.
Enterprise Linux Selection Guide
Considering moving your enterprise to the Linux operating system? Since there are so many similar versions, choosing the right one can be tough. This paper offers a clear process to help you make an informed decision and get the features, support, and cost that are right for your business and technical needs.
Overcoming Challenges in Managing Linux
Levanta has created a new administration model with innovative technology that breaks down the barriers to making the most of Linux systems. This paper will provide an in-depth look at the workings of Levanta’s product, the first Linux appliance of its kind.
SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 for Retail Businesses
Discover why major retailers have switched to SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop in the back office. SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 is a low-cost desktop that offers a complete set of productivity applications and interoperates seamlessly with the other Windows, Macintosh and UNIX desktops in your store.
Moving to a Linux Desktop
Migrating from Windows to Linux on the desktop can be a substantial undertaking because it has the potential for touching -- and perhaps disrupting -- every user in your organization. Unlike a data center (server and infrastructure) migration that is largely transparent to users, the cultural and administrative transitions and environment readiness required to support a Linux desktop migration are extensive.
Seven Good Reasons to Exchange Exchange
This paper describes seven compelling reasons why you should switch from Exchange to Scalix.
|
|
|
|
|
news feed