| Thunderbird 1.5 deemed unready for enterprise prime time |
Oct. 10, 2005
eWEEK.com senior editor Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols has "a love/hate relationship" with Thunderbird, the Mozilla Foundation's open-source stand-alone email client. Beta 1.5 of the open-source Thunderbird email client is looking a lot better, but it still lacks calendar functions, he writes.
Vaughan-Nichols explains:
On the one hand, while Thunderbird is a fine replacement for Outlook Express, Eudora or Pegasus Mail, for light email users, the 1.0x versions really failed at handling large jobs (such as 1,000+ email folders).
In addition, the current Thunderbird has problems with memory leaks, search and filtering problems and a variety of bugs, ranging from minor to program-stopping.
And, while it is not as vulnerable as Outlook, Thunderbird has had its share of security holes.
Fortunately for its users, the Mozilla Foundation is much faster at fixing the bugs in its programs than Microsoft is at fixing the ones in its software.
As someone who uses multiple platforms, I also am inclined to like Thunderbird because it runs on Linux, Windows and Mac OS.
So it was that I've been really looking forward to the next major revision of Thunderbird.
I'm pleased to say that many of the bugs have now been squashed. In my use of a late version of the beta 1, I found it both faster and far more efficient at handling memory problems.
I also found that its search functionality, which I had eventually entirely abandoned in the 1.0 series in favor of Google Desktop on Windows and Beagle on Linux, is now both dependent and useful.
Another feature, which users on the go will appreciate, is that Thunderbird now handles multiple SMTP mail transport correctly. In the past, while you could list multiple SMTP servers, the program would actually only use one of them.
Since mobile users have to deal with Internet connections that may or may not let them access SMTP network ports depending upon their addresses, the ability to automatically switch from one SMTP to another makes sending mail from the road much easier.
I found these improvements on both the Windows and Linux platforms.
For Windows, I ran Thunderbird using Windows XP SP 2 on a 3GHz Pentium IV system with 1GB of RAM. For Linux, I used it with SuSE Linux 9.3 and a late beta of SuSE 10 on a pair of 2.8GHz Pentium IV PCs with 512MBs of RAM.
For these improvements alone, I'd recommend Thunderbird over Outlook Express and most other individual end user email programs such as Qualcomm's Eudora.
However, Thunderbird 1.5 also has many new features. Some of them, such as spell-checking while you type or being able to handle Podcasting, aren't very important to me. Others, though, will be important to any user.
For example, the built-in phishing detector makes clicking your way into Internet fraud sites harder.
It's not perfect: I found it gave false positives quite frequently. That said, Thunderbird also caught all the real phishing emails that came my way.
Doubtlessly, some poisoned messages will escape it as phishers grow ever sneakier, but anything that helps stops phishing is A-ok in my book.
It also has improved handling of reply and forward options based on message filters. If you're like me, and you spend a lot of time dealing with email, these options can help you automate your mail handling.
Another handy new tool for dealing with email is that the program now gives you the option of deleting attachments from messages. I find this very handy for getting rid of large PDF files and the like while keeping the cover letter, which had the real information I needed.
For business users, Thunderbird has added many new features. For example, instead of requiring you to re-install the program for an update, you will now be able to patch the program in place with a small download.
In addition, you can now integrate Thunderbird's spam detection with server-based detection. In my case, I use SpamAssassin on my Linux-based email servers.
The program can also use Kerberos authentication, which makes it easier to integrate with a network directory system. In an experiment, I was able to integrate Thunderbird usage with Novell's LDAP eDirectory running on Novell Linux SBS (Small Business Server).
It was not a walk around the park, but it was doable. Before, integrating Thunderbird into a serious business network would have been nigh unto impossible.
That's all great, but I still can't recommend Thunderbird for large business use. It still doesn't have individual, never mind group, calendaring and schedule management capabilities.
The Mozilla Foundation knows that this is a weakness. Its programmers are working to address it. In the past, this has been in Sunbird, the Mozilla Calendar extension project.
More recently, Mozilla's developers have been working on Lightning. This program, according to its Web site, "aims to integrate into the main Thunderbird UI and user interaction model as tightly as possible."
The developers, however, to the best of my knowledge, do not have any plans to support Extended MAPI (Microsoft's Messaging API) in any version of Thunderbird.
This is unfortunate. While you can use Thunderbird to send and receive mail from Microsoft Exchange if the Exchange server has been set to support POP (Post Office Protocol), SMTP or IMAP, without Extended MAPI support Thunderbird can't access Exchange's calendaring functionality. And, no matter what one thinks of Exchange as a program, it is the scheduling engine for many businesses.
So it is that while I can look forward to the final release of Thunderbird 1.5 as a great replacement for Outlook Express and the like for individuals and small businesses, I still will not be able to recommend it as an enterprise program.
If you want an open-source email client that also supports scheduling and can deal with Exchange, your choice remains Novell's Evolution on Linux. There are no good open-source alternatives for big business email on Windows.
Hopefully, as Lightning matures, the Mozilla Foundation will be able to present users with a compelling enterprise-level Thunderbird, but 1.5 will not be it.
If you found this eWEEK.com article by Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols informative, be sure to check out eWEEK.com's Linux & Open Source Center for the latest open-source news, reviews, and analysis.
Related stories:
(Click here for further information)
|
|
|
7 Advantages of D2D Backup
For decades, tape has been the backup medium of choice. But, now, disk-to-disk (D2D) backup is gaining in favor. Learn why you should make the move in this whitepaper.
4 Legal Reasons to Control Internet Access
The Internet is obviously a valuable resource for many organizations. However, many are exposed to legal liability concerns because they fail to control Internet access. Learn if you're safe in this white paper.
Rapidly Resolve J2EE Application Problems
Whether you are in the process of building J2EE applications or have J2EE applications already running in production, you must ensure that they deliver the expected ROI. Learn how in this white paper.
Load Testing 2.0 for Web 2.0
There are many unknowns in stress testing Web 2.0 applications. Find out how to test the performance of Web 2.0 in this white paper.
Build Better Games Online
For the game infrastructure providers, life is complex. Making money from games has become more complicated. Why? Find out in this white paper.
Building a Virtual Infrastructure from Servers to Storage
This white paper discusses the virtual storage solutions that reduce cost, increase storage utilization, and address the challenges of backing up and restoring Server environments.
Gaining Faster Wireless Connections with WiMAX
Welcome to what is quickly becoming the hyperconnected world where anything that would benefit from being connected to the network will be connected. Learn more in this white paper.
Is Your Desktop a Security Threat?
The new wave of sophisticated crimeware not only targets specific companies, but also targets desktops and laptops as backdoor entryways into those business’ operations and resources. Learn how to stay safe in this white paper.
Increasing SAN Reliability by 100 Percent
Storage area networks (SAN) are a strong part of storage plans. Learn how to increase your reliability and uptime by 100 percent in this case study.
|
|
|
|
|